[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

m68k@buildd.d.o bounces?



Hi,

when trying to contact the m68k team via their @buildd.d.o address earlier today, I noticed that there seems to be a problem with the address. See message below (and my original request as well). I thought you might want to know ;)

Best regards
Sascha

> Begin forwarded message:
> 
> From: Mail Delivery System <Mailer-Daemon@molnjunk.nocrew.org>
> Subject: Mail delivery failed: returning message to sender
> Date: 10 January 2016 at 12:13:36 GMT
> To: sascha@steinbiss.name
> 
> This message was created automatically by mail delivery software.
> 
> A message that you sent could not be delivered to one or more of its
> recipients. This is a permanent error. The following address(es) failed:
> 
>  pipe to |/var/lib/mailman/mail/mailman post m68k-build
>    generated by m68k-build@nocrew.org
>    local delivery failed
> 
> The following text was generated during the delivery attempt:
> 
> ------ pipe to |/var/lib/mailman/mail/mailman post m68k-build
>       generated by m68k-build@nocrew.org ------
> 
> post script, list not found: m68k-build
> 
> ------ This is a copy of the message, including all the headers. ------
> 
> Return-path: <sascha@steinbiss.name>
> Received: from wuiet.debian.org ([5.153.231.18])
> 	by molnjunk.nocrew.org with esmtp (Exim 4.76)
> 	(envelope-from <sascha@steinbiss.name>)
> 	id 1aIEsK-0002ny-AY
> 	for m68k-build@nocrew.org; Sun, 10 Jan 2016 13:13:36 +0100
> Received: from tetrinetsucht.de ([88.80.200.78] ident=Debian-exim)
> 	by wuiet.debian.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256)
> 	(Exim 4.84)
> 	(envelope-from <sascha@steinbiss.name>)
> 	id 1aIEs1-0007HA-Dy
> 	for m68k-build@nocrew.org; Sun, 10 Jan 2016 12:13:36 +0000
> Received: from XXX ([XXXX] helo=[192.168.1.2])
> 	by tetrinetsucht.de with esmtpsa (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32)
> 	(Exim 4.72)
> 	(envelope-from <sascha@steinbiss.name>)
> 	id 1aIErz-0000zc-6h
> 	for m68k@buildd.debian.org; Sun, 10 Jan 2016 13:13:15 +0100
> From: Sascha Steinbiss <sascha@steinbiss.name>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
> Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
> Message-Id: <05350B37-41DA-4BDC-BDDF-40EF0A3D0F76@steinbiss.name>
> Date: Sun, 10 Jan 2016 12:13:09 +0000
> To: m68k-build@nocrew.org
> Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 9.2 \(3112\))
> X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3112)
> X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 81.101.15.93
> X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: sascha@steinbiss.name
> X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on tetrinetsucht.de
> X-Spam-Level: 
> X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.9 required=3.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,BAYES_00
> 	autolearn=ham version=3.3.2
> Subject: package kmc autobuild 
> X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.2.1 (built Mon, 26 Dec 2011 16:57:07 +0000)
> X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes (on tetrinetsucht.de)
> 
> Hello,
> 
> I have noticed that the kmc package fails to build on m68k with a fairly =
> generic message:
> 
> https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=3Dkmc
> 
> Since this is a C++ package for which compilation can be quite =
> resource-intensive and take a long time, it could be that the build =
> machine might not be up to it. Maybe you know more about the involved =
> machines and whether there might be any chance to get the package built =
> on all theoretically possible platforms?
> 
> Many thanks,
> Sascha=


Reply to: