Re: Bug#794964: gettext: must redo libstdc++ ABI transition because not done right
On Sat, Aug 08, 2015 at 09:45:33PM +0000, Thorsten Glaser wrote:
> including ports that don’t yet exist.
Hmm. I don't think we should really worry about that case.
Ports that do not even exist yet will definitely need a working gcc-5
if they ever expect to be released architectures some day.
So the natural thing to do (which I think it is what we have always done,
but I may be wrong) is to use unstable as their starting point, not stable.
Reply to: