Re: Bug#649718: guile-2.0_2.0.11+1-5 still FTBFS on m68k (one testcase)

To: Thorsten Glaser <t.glaser@tarent.de>, 649718@bugs.debian.org
Cc: debian-68k@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: Bug#649718: guile-2.0_2.0.11+1-5 still FTBFS on m68k (one testcase)
From: Rob Browning <rlb@defaultvalue.org>
Date: Sat, 27 Sep 2014 17:44:27 -0500
Message-id: <[🔎] 87d2agpttg.fsf@trouble.defaultvalue.org>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 87iok8q5is.fsf@trouble.defaultvalue.org>
References: <[🔎] alpine.DEB.2.11.1409271827180.8220@tglase.lan.tarent.de> <[🔎] 87iok8q5is.fsf@trouble.defaultvalue.org>

Rob Browning <rlb@defaultvalue.org> writes:

> Mark Weaver pointed out a potential upstream fix (involving more
> complete alignment handling), so I'll be changing our patch to be the
> appropriate cherry-pick for -6.

Uploaded -6.  Please let me know if if helps when you have a chance to
try it.

Thanks
-- 
Rob Browning
rlb @defaultvalue.org and @debian.org
GPG as of 2011-07-10 E6A9 DA3C C9FD 1FF8 C676 D2C4 C0F0 39E9 ED1B 597A
GPG as of 2002-11-03 14DD 432F AE39 534D B592 F9A0 25C8 D377 8C7E 73A4

Reply to:

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Bug#649718: guile-2.0_2.0.11+1-5 still FTBFS on m68k (one testcase)
  - From: Thorsten Glaser <tg@mirbsd.de>

References:
- guile-2.0_2.0.11+1-5 still FTBFS on m68k (one testcase)
  - From: Thorsten Glaser <t.glaser@tarent.de>
- Re: Bug#649718: guile-2.0_2.0.11+1-5 still FTBFS on m68k (one testcase)
  - From: Rob Browning <rlb@defaultvalue.org>

Prev by Date: Re: Bug#649718: guile-2.0_2.0.11+1-5 still FTBFS on m68k (one testcase)
Next by Date: Re: Bug#649718: guile-2.0_2.0.11+1-5 still FTBFS on m68k (one testcase)
Previous by thread: Re: Bug#649718: guile-2.0_2.0.11+1-5 still FTBFS on m68k (one testcase)
Next by thread: Re: Bug#649718: guile-2.0_2.0.11+1-5 still FTBFS on m68k (one testcase)
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread