Re: [Mesa-dev] Updated debdiff for mesa to compile on m68k
On Thu, Jul 17, 2014 at 10:24 AM, Thorsten Glaser <t.glaser@tarent.de> wrote:
> On Thu, 17 Jul 2014, Ilia Mirkin wrote:
>
>> Yes, implicit padding is definitely bad. I didn't realize I even had
>> it in there, although I'm glad my STATIC_ASSERT did its job. There are
>
> ;-)
>
>> various references to patches, however I haven't seen any. Perhaps
>> they're lost in my inbox, or they were never sent to mesa-dev, or
>> something else. Could the patch author (or another interested party)
>> send it as a proper patch to mesa-dev? Assuming it doesn't break x86,
>> happy to check it in.
>
> Oh fun. I’m the patch author, and it was here:
> https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?msg=37;filename=mesa_10.2.3-1%2Bm68k.1.debdiff;att=1;bug=728053
>
> I’ve attached the part you’re probably most interested in.
Thanks! Munged the commit description a little and pushed to the
master branch. I think the patches for 10.2.4 have already been
selected, so it should make its way into 10.2.5.
-ilia
Reply to: