Geert,
Might be cleanest - please bump the bootinfo version in that case so we canfall back to some default logic if the device tree is absent.Oops, I forgot to insert the obligatory smiley.
Do tell ... I was briefly wondering about that. Weirder things have happened.
I don't think it's worth the effort to add DT support for the existing platforms.If we *have* to, we can handle it in a boot wrapper. All information is in theexisting bootinfo and arch/m68k/<mach>/config.c.
So order of appearance in bootinfo == order of priority?Which reminds me - I still need to test making a chunk of ST-RAM available to atafb via ioremap(), for a quick fix to the TT boot problems.
Cheers, Michael
Gr{oetje,eeting}s, Geert --Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@linux-m68k.orgIn personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.-- Linus Torvalds