Re: changing the java default to java7, and dropping java support for some architectures
Matthias Klose dixit:
>Currently java bindings/packages are built for all architectures, however some
>architectures still use gcj as the (only available) Java implementation, and
>some OpenJDK zero ports are non-functional at this point, and Debian porters
>usually don't care about that. So the architectures to drop java support would be
Yeah, sorry, I really should contact the Zero developers about
why it doesn’t work on m68k. On the other hand, judging from
the talk at FOSDEM, their focus seems to be on Shark these days,
and Zero isn’t worked much on upstream either… but “us porters”
should definitely get at least Zero working.
(No LLVM for m68k in sight. There’s a project, but everything
interesting is stubbed out. I don’t do C++.)
bye,
//mirabilos
--
Solange man keine schmutzigen Tricks macht, und ich meine *wirklich*
schmutzige Tricks, wie bei einer doppelt verketteten Liste beide
Pointer XORen und in nur einem Word speichern, funktioniert Boehm ganz
hervorragend. -- Andreas Bogk über boehm-gc in d.a.s.r
Reply to: