Re: The future of an SCC that has been given up on
Thorsten Glaser <tg@mirbsd.de> writes:
> Andreas Schwab dixit:
>
>>schmitz <schmitz@biophys.uni-duesseldorf.de> writes:
>>
>>> I begin to understand the nightmare. X will have to be built then.
>>
>>But only the client libraries, which don't depend on the X server.
>
> Well, X is X and I don’t care about whether it’s one package less
> for the server… the server’s not the dependency nightmare involved.
Then I don't understand what all the fuss is about. The X libraries
have a rather well behaved dependency tree.
Andreas.
--
Andreas Schwab, schwab@linux-m68k.org
GPG Key fingerprint = 58CA 54C7 6D53 942B 1756 01D3 44D5 214B 8276 4ED5
"And now for something completely different."
Reply to: