Re: Bug#672773: [wnpp] removal of emile has been requested!
Steve McIntyre dixit:
>Sorry, but we don't care. m68k has now missed 3 Debian releases
>running. That's over 6 years! We should not continue pandering to the
>insane idea that m68k is ever going to release with Debian again. This
>package has been RC-buggy since approximately forever and should just
>be dropped from the archive. Providing convenience for the
>vanishingly-small number of remaining m68k users is not a good enough
>excuse.
OK, I see.
bye,
//mirabilos
--
«MyISAM tables -will- get corrupted eventually. This is a fact of life. »
“mysql is about as much database as ms access” – “MSSQL at least descends
from a database” “it's a rebranded SyBase” “MySQL however was born from a
flatfile and went downhill from there” – “at least jetDB doesn’t claim to
be a database” -- Tonnerre, psychoschlumpf and myself in #nosec
Reply to: