Re: 3.2

[Thorsten Glaser <tg@mirbsd.de>]

Ben Hutchings dixit:

>On Wed, 2012-01-25 at 03:46 +0000, Ben Hutchings wrote:
>[...]
>> Sorry, you missed it.  But we can upload again pretty soon.

No problem. It’s still compiling anyway, so while I know the
kernel and modules build and it boots, the packaging bits are
still there to run. (Currently at fs/btrfs on the last flavour.)

>> All looks good except that I think aufs should be fixed by changing its

I agree that it should be fixed in aufs, but I used this minimal-
intrusive change until the aufs people agreed on a fix, since there
were a lot of patch suggestions and not much consensus (I wanted to
get up to speed with things like using gcc-4.6 first, so I used a
patch I knew worked).

>> pr_fmt macro (which I thought I had done - sorry about that).
>
>I've updated aufs to the current version for Linux 3.2, which has a
>different fix again.

OK, we’ll see how this goes with the next upload then.
Thanks!

bye,
//mirabilos
-- 
[...] if maybe ext3fs wasn't a better pick, or jfs, or maybe reiserfs, oh but
what about xfs, and if only i had waited until reiser4 was ready... in the be-
ginning, there was ffs, and in the middle, there was ffs, and at the end, there
was still ffs, and the sys admins knew it was good. :)  -- Ted Unangst über *fs