Re: [m68k] eglibc expected(?) testsuite results

To: debian-68k@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: [m68k] eglibc expected(?) testsuite results
From: Thorsten Glaser <tg@mirbsd.de>
Date: Sat, 17 Dec 2011 23:29:37 +0000 (UTC)
Message-id: <[🔎] Pine.BSM.4.64L.1112172328500.856@herc.mirbsd.org>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] alpine.LNX.2.00.1112181005020.3372@nippy.intranet>
References: <[🔎] Pine.BSM.4.64L.1112151245590.15460@herc.mirbsd.org> <[🔎] 20111217005938.GF9956@hall.aurel32.net> <[🔎] alpine.LNX.2.00.1112171205410.3027@nippy.intranet> <[🔎] Pine.BSM.4.64L.1112170323190.856@herc.mirbsd.org> <[🔎] alpine.LNX.2.00.1112181005020.3372@nippy.intranet>

Finn Thain dixit:

>> >It might be worth running the tests on physical hardware instead of an 
>> >emulator.
>> 
>> You just volunteered.
>
>You just promoted me to Debian Developer.

https://nm.debian.org/

But jokes aside, you don’t need to be DD for that.
Just have a Debian chroot (or just cowbuilder with
a Debian chroot) on a box.

bye,
//mirabilos
-- 
  “Having a smoking section in a restaurant is like having
          a peeing section in a swimming pool.”
						-- Edward Burr

Reply to:

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [m68k] eglibc expected(?) testsuite results
  - From: Finn Thain <fthain@telegraphics.com.au>

References:
- [m68k] eglibc expected(?) testsuite results
  - From: Thorsten Glaser <tg@debian.org>
- Re: [m68k] eglibc expected(?) testsuite results
  - From: Aurelien Jarno <aurelien@aurel32.net>
- Re: [m68k] eglibc expected(?) testsuite results
  - From: Finn Thain <fthain@telegraphics.com.au>
- Re: [m68k] eglibc expected(?) testsuite results
  - From: Thorsten Glaser <tg@mirbsd.de>
- Re: [m68k] eglibc expected(?) testsuite results
  - From: Finn Thain <fthain@telegraphics.com.au>

Prev by Date: Re: [m68k] eglibc expected(?) testsuite results
Next by Date: Re: [m68k] eglibc expected(?) testsuite results
Previous by thread: Re: [m68k] eglibc expected(?) testsuite results
Next by thread: Re: [m68k] eglibc expected(?) testsuite results
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread