Re: [m68k] eglibc expected(?) testsuite results

To: Thorsten Glaser <tg@mirbsd.de>
Cc: debian-68k@lists.debian.org, GNU Libc Maintainers <debian-glibc@lists.debian.org>
Subject: Re: [m68k] eglibc expected(?) testsuite results
From: Finn Thain <fthain@telegraphics.com.au>
Date: Sun, 18 Dec 2011 10:05:22 +1100 (EST)
Message-id: <[🔎] alpine.LNX.2.00.1112181005020.3372@nippy.intranet>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] Pine.BSM.4.64L.1112170323190.856@herc.mirbsd.org>
References: <[🔎] Pine.BSM.4.64L.1112151245590.15460@herc.mirbsd.org> <[🔎] 20111217005938.GF9956@hall.aurel32.net> <[🔎] alpine.LNX.2.00.1112171205410.3027@nippy.intranet> <[🔎] Pine.BSM.4.64L.1112170323190.856@herc.mirbsd.org>

On Sat, 17 Dec 2011, Thorsten Glaser wrote:

> Finn Thain dixit:
> 
> >It might be worth running the tests on physical hardware instead of an 
> >emulator.
> 
> You just volunteered.

You just promoted me to Debian Developer.

Finn

Reply to:

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [m68k] eglibc expected(?) testsuite results
  - From: Thorsten Glaser <tg@mirbsd.de>

References:
- [m68k] eglibc expected(?) testsuite results
  - From: Thorsten Glaser <tg@debian.org>
- Re: [m68k] eglibc expected(?) testsuite results
  - From: Aurelien Jarno <aurelien@aurel32.net>
- Re: [m68k] eglibc expected(?) testsuite results
  - From: Finn Thain <fthain@telegraphics.com.au>
- Re: [m68k] eglibc expected(?) testsuite results
  - From: Thorsten Glaser <tg@mirbsd.de>

Prev by Date: Re: [m68k] eglibc expected(?) testsuite results
Next by Date: Re: [m68k] eglibc expected(?) testsuite results
Previous by thread: Re: [m68k] eglibc expected(?) testsuite results
Next by thread: Re: [m68k] eglibc expected(?) testsuite results
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread