Re: GCC-4.5 as the default for (at least some) architectures
On 02.03.2011 07:36, Konstantinos Margaritis wrote:
> On 2 March 2011 03:34, Matthias Klose <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
>> I'll make gcc-4.5 the default for (at least some) architectures within the
>> two weeks before more transitions start. GCC-4.5 is already used as the
>> compiler for almost any other distribution, so there shouldn't be many
>> on at least the common architectures. About 50% of the build failures
>> by GCC-4.5 are fixed . I didn't see issues on amd64 and i386, armel
>> (although optimized for a different processor) and powerpc (some object
>> linked into shared libs had to be built as pic).
>> As the maintainer file for the ports in GCC is a bit outdated, I'd like to
>> which architectures should do the switch together with the four
>> mentioned above, and which not, and which ones should be better delayed, or
> Could you add armhf to the list?
keeping armhf to build from the linaro branch?