Re: Another gcj (boehm-gc?) related FTBFS for y’all to look at

To: Thorsten Glaser <tg@mirbsd.de>
Cc: debian-68k@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: Another gcj (boehm-gc?) related FTBFS for y’all to look at
From: Andreas Schwab <schwab@linux-m68k.org>
Date: Tue, 04 Jan 2011 19:51:18 +0100
Message-id: <[🔎] m21v4sijtl.fsf@igel.home>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] Pine.BSM.4.64L.1101041754480.12075@herc.mirbsd.org> (Thorsten Glaser's message of "Tue, 4 Jan 2011 17:55:57 +0000 (UTC)")
References: <[🔎] alpine.DEB.2.00.1101020045180.11515@tglase.bonn.tarent.de> <[🔎] m2bp3z5b77.fsf@igel.home> <[🔎] Pine.BSM.4.64L.1101041754480.12075@herc.mirbsd.org>

Thorsten Glaser <tg@mirbsd.de> writes:

> Andreas Schwab dixit:
>
>>Please try this patch.
>
> Doesn’t help after only rebuilding eglibc.
> Do I need to recompile gcj for this, too?

Yes, anything that uses sem_t must be recompiled.

Andreas.

-- 
Andreas Schwab, schwab@linux-m68k.org
GPG Key fingerprint = 58CA 54C7 6D53 942B 1756  01D3 44D5 214B 8276 4ED5
"And now for something completely different."

Reply to:

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Another gcj (boehm-gc?) related FTBFS for y’all to look at
  - From: Thorsten Glaser <tg@mirbsd.de>

References:
- Another gcj (boehm-gc?) related FTBFS for y’all to look at
  - From: Thorsten Glaser <tg@mirbsd.de>
- Re: Another gcj (boehm-gc?) related FTBFS for y’all to look at
  - From: Andreas Schwab <schwab@linux-m68k.org>
- Re: Another gcj (boehm-gc?) related FTBFS for y’all to look at
  - From: Thorsten Glaser <tg@mirbsd.de>

Prev by Date: Re: Another gcj (boehm-gc?) related FTBFS for y’all to look at
Next by Date: Re: apt-get at 2147483648%
Previous by thread: Re: Another gcj (boehm-gc?) related FTBFS for y’all to look at
Next by thread: Re: Another gcj (boehm-gc?) related FTBFS for y’all to look at
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread