Re: gcc 4.5 and TLS
On Fri, 4 Jun 2010, Thorsten Glaser wrote:
> Finn Thain dixit:
>
> >Better to adopt the 4 byte alignment rather than relax the requirement?
> >Or
>
> Why? I mean, you can force alignment where it?s needed, at least in gcc
> (and clang and pcc and and and?) so there?s no need to waste memory,
> especially considering the target platform. See my other mail for an
> example (in actual use).
When I asked the question, I figured that Andreas would have simply added
the attribute if there was no cost to doing so...
Finn
>
> bye,
> //mirabilos
>
Reply to: