Re: gcc bug?
Finn Thain dixit:
>gas is happy with line 1735 (and all the other occurrances except line
>1299). It seems to be the "+4" offset that gas doesn't like:
>I'm afraid I have no idea whether this is a bug in gas or gcc.
Yeah, that’s about what I could gather from it too (although I
bow before your superiour platform knowledge).
This is now http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12157
(maybe they have an idea).
bye,
//mirabilos
--
Solange man keine schmutzigen Tricks macht, und ich meine *wirklich*
schmutzige Tricks, wie bei einer doppelt verketteten Liste beide
Pointer XORen und in nur einem Word speichern, funktioniert Boehm ganz
hervorragend. -- Andreas Bogk über boehm-gc in d.a.s.r
Reply to: