On Fri, Jul 11, 2008 at 06:08:10PM +0200, Christian T. Steigies wrote: > On Fri, Jul 11, 2008 at 10:04:35AM -0500, Stephen R Marenka wrote: > > On Fri, Jul 11, 2008 at 10:18:05AM +0200, Christian T. Steigies wrote: > > > On Fri, Jul 11, 2008 at 05:36:05AM +0200, Michael Schmitz wrote: > > > > > > > > >Christian: I'd like to see the patches in [1] in the next > > > > >linux-2.6 release. We should also be able to move linux-2.6 to > > > > >the same compiler version, currently gcc-4.1, as the other archs. > > > > >This requires the m68k-build-id.diff patch. > > > > > > > > I'd like to see another patch - the correction of operator precedence in > > > > atari_keyb_init which I reported yesterday to linux-m68k. The patch will > > > > be forthcoming shortly. > > > > > > Sorry folks, I will fly to Montreal tomorrow morning and I am swamped at the > > > University, I don't think I can submit those patches _and_ test them. Does > > > anybody else have access to the debian-kernel svn? > > > > If no one else is willing or has access, I'll see if I can apply for > > access. I don't follow d-kernel though. Perhaps I should again. > > > > Changing the compiler is an abi bump and I sure don't know how to do > > that properly. > > I think I read that there will be no upload of 2.6.25 anymore, so if you > commit these changes to 2.6.26, that should not be a problem? It looks like there are no m68k patches in svn or even the 2-extra series that used to load those patches. Do I need to duplicate all that? Thanks, Stephen -- Stephen R. Marenka If life's not fun, you're not doing it right! <stephen@marenka.net>
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature