Re: ilmbase
On Mon, Apr 28, 2008 at 02:56:23AM +0200, Michael Schmitz wrote:
> Hi,
>
>>> Also, is this the only test that's failing?
>>
>> Nope, there was another one later on IIRC. I'll disable the PosQNan2
>> and NegQNan* checks and investigate.
>
> It so turns out that NaN handling by the testsuite was all that fails on
> my machine, due to compiler and binutils assumptions about what's
> counting as NaN on m68k. Basically, cpp does substitute anything that it
> knows to not represent a valid float by a const nan of positive sign.
>
> The following patch to the HalfTest suite makes the testsuite failure go
> away. Please apply. In the alternative, please indicate whether a binNMU
> would be in order.
Dato told me on IRC yesterday that it would be okay for us to do so.
Please proceed.
--
<Lo-lan-do> Home is where you have to wash the dishes.
-- #debian-devel, Freenode, 2004-09-22
Reply to:
- References:
- Re: ilmbase
- From: Stephen R Marenka <stephen@marenka.net>
- Re: ilmbase
- From: Stephen R Marenka <stephen@marenka.net>
- Re: ilmbase
- From: Michael Schmitz <schmitz@zirkon.biophys.uni-duesseldorf.de>
- Re: ilmbase
- From: Stephen R Marenka <stephen@marenka.net>
- Re: ilmbase
- From: Michael Schmitz <schmitz@zirkon.biophys.uni-duesseldorf.de>
- Re: ilmbase
- From: Stephen R Marenka <stephen@marenka.net>
- Re: ilmbase
- From: Michael Schmitz <schmitz@zirkon.biophys.uni-duesseldorf.de>
- Re: ilmbase
- From: Wouter Verhelst <wouter@debian.org>
- Re: ilmbase
- From: Michael Schmitz <schmitz@zirkon.biophys.uni-duesseldorf.de>
- Re: ilmbase
- From: Michael Schmitz <schmitz@zirkon.biophys.uni-duesseldorf.de>