Re: ilmbase
Seems we didn't Cc the maintainer on this conversation...
On Sat, Apr 26, 2008 at 05:14:15AM +0200, Michael Schmitz wrote:
>>>> Want me to try it with the same versions on aranym?
>>>
>>> That's probably not worth it. Do you stil have the build tree?
>>
>> No for t2 (aranym), but yes for spice (040). Something I can dump for
>> you?
>
> Just testBitPatterns.o in the HalfTest build directory would be enough.
>
> Using -O0 the test succeeds. Considering NaN handling is correct even
> though the precise bit patterns are not preserved (by gcc, mind you) I'd
> say these extra pedantic tests need to be disabled on m68k.
Dato, could you please do that?
> I'll see if I can find my 68881 manual (not sure it moved to NZ with
> me - I thought I'd never need that again).
Also, is this the only test that's failing?
--
<Lo-lan-do> Home is where you have to wash the dishes.
-- #debian-devel, Freenode, 2004-09-22
Reply to:
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: ilmbase
- From: Michael Schmitz <schmitz@zirkon.biophys.uni-duesseldorf.de>
- References:
- ilmbase
- From: Wouter Verhelst <wouter@debian.org>
- Re: ilmbase
- From: Michael Schmitz <schmitz@zirkon.biophys.uni-duesseldorf.de>
- Re: ilmbase
- From: Michael Schmitz <schmitz@zirkon.biophys.uni-duesseldorf.de>
- Re: ilmbase
- From: Stephen R Marenka <stephen@marenka.net>
- Re: ilmbase
- From: Stephen R Marenka <stephen@marenka.net>
- Re: ilmbase
- From: Michael Schmitz <schmitz@zirkon.biophys.uni-duesseldorf.de>
- Re: ilmbase
- From: Stephen R Marenka <stephen@marenka.net>
- Re: ilmbase
- From: Michael Schmitz <schmitz@zirkon.biophys.uni-duesseldorf.de>
- Re: ilmbase
- From: Stephen R Marenka <stephen@marenka.net>
- Re: ilmbase
- From: Michael Schmitz <schmitz@zirkon.biophys.uni-duesseldorf.de>