[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

m68k is not supported in glibc



FYI

I guess we knew this was coming.

----- Forwarded message from Aurelien Jarno <aurelien@aurel32.net> -----

From: Aurelien Jarno <aurelien@aurel32.net>
To: stephen@marenka.net, 446503@bugs.debian.org
Subject: Re: Bug#446503: [m68k] FTBFS: missing lowlevellock.h
X-Mail-Handler: MailHop by DynDNS
X-Originating-IP: 88.191.38.19

retitle 446503 glibc: m68K architecture is not supported
tag 446503 + wontfix
thanks

stephen@marenka.net a écrit :
> Package: glibc
> Version: 2.6.1-5
> Severity: important
> 
> 
> glibc fails to build from source on m68k due to missing lowlevellock.h.
> 

lowlevellock.h is only the top of the iceberg. m68k is completely
unsupported upstream and doesn't have TLS support. We (the glibc team)
do not plan to work on that. Patches are welcome though.

-- 
  .''`.  Aurelien Jarno	            | GPG: 1024D/F1BCDB73
 : :' :  Debian developer           | Electrical Engineer
 `. `'   aurel32@debian.org         | aurelien@aurel32.net
   `-    people.debian.org/~aurel32 | www.aurel32.net


----- End forwarded message -----

-- 
Stephen R. Marenka     If life's not fun, you're not doing it right!
<stephen@marenka.net>

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Reply to: