On Mon, Jun 18, 2007 at 11:35:39PM +0200, Bill Allombert wrote: > This is my attempt with quinn-diff: > Between etch and etch-m68k: > <http://people.debian.org/~ballombe/m68k/diff-etch-m68k> > Between etch and security.d.o: 40 source packages. > > The list of package marked out-of-date: > > x11/libx11_2:1.0.3-7.dsc > devel/mozart_1.3.2.20060615+dfsg-2.dsc > devel/klic_3.003-gm1-2.1.dsc > devel/haskelldb_0.9.cvs.601-13.dsc > python/python2.4_2.4.4-3.dsc > utils/fcitx_1:3.4.3-1.dsc > graphics/blender_2.42a-7.dsc > libs/kdelibs_4:3.5.5a.dfsg.1-8.dsc > libs/db4.2_4.2.52+dfsg-2.dsc > devel/mozart-gtk_20060615-2.dsc > graphics/ctn_3.0.6-10.dsc > admin/brltty_3.7.2-7.1.dsc > devel/libsigsegv_2.4-1.dsc > net/ejabberd_1.1.2-6.dsc > interpreters/sigscheme_0.6.1-1.dsc > devel/systemtap_0.0.20061028-2.dsc > math/octave2.9-forge_2006.07.09+dfsg1-8.dsc > interpreters/erlang_1:11.b.2-4.dsc > interpreters/gnu-smalltalk_2.1.8-2.1.dsc > web/yaws_1.65-4.dsc > > By the way, if I build them, can I upload them ? How ? > Can we remove packages that should be 'not for us' ? I'm told that all you need to do is upload them with dist=etch-m68k. Since we have neither a proposed-updates nor a security distribution, I think we should shove them all in etch-m68k and be done with it. If you're willing to start building and uploading, that would be great. Thanks, Stephen -- Stephen R. Marenka If life's not fun, you're not doing it right! <stephen@marenka.net>
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature