Re: more binutils?
On Wed, Jun 13, 2007 at 07:14:55AM -0500, Stephen R Marenka wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 12, 2007 at 06:20:24PM +0200, Christian T. Steigies wrote:
> > On Tue, Jun 12, 2007 at 05:38:20PM +0200, Michael Schmitz wrote:
> > >
> > > Nope - we should perhaps verify it's a real regression first. Do you have
> > > a quick test case available? Does anyone have the previous known good
> > > version of binutils around?
> > Which is a good version? My apt-cache/proxy have these versions:
> > binutils_2.17-2+b2_m68k.deb
> > binutils-dev_2.17-2+b2_m68k.deb
> > binutils_2.17-3_m68k.deb
> > binutils-dev_2.17-3_m68k.deb
> > binutils_2.17cvs20070426-3_m68k.deb
> > binutils_2.17cvs20070426-6_m68k.deb
> > binutils_2.17cvs20070426-8_m68k.deb
> I have 2.17-3 and 2.17cvs20070426-8. Can you put the others where I can
> grab them?