Re: more binutils?

[Michael Schmitz <schmitz@mail.biophys.uni-duesseldorf.de>]

> > Nope - we should perhaps verify it's a real regression first. Do you have
> > a quick test case available? Does anyone have the previous known good
> > version of binutils around?
>
> Which is a good version? My apt-cache/proxy have these versions:
>
> binutils_2.17-2+b2_m68k.deb
> binutils-dev_2.17-2+b2_m68k.deb
> binutils_2.17-3_m68k.deb
> binutils-dev_2.17-3_m68k.deb

I'd try 2.17-3 then 2.17-2+b2.

> binutils_2.17cvs20070426-3_m68k.deb
> binutils_2.17cvs20070426-6_m68k.deb
> binutils_2.17cvs20070426-8_m68k.deb

These I suspect are the broken ones.

	Michael