Re: building emile

To: Wouter Verhelst <wouter@grep.be>
Cc: debian-68k@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: building emile
From: Laurent Vivier <laurent@lvivier.info>
Date: Wed, 8 Nov 2006 22:46:05 +0100
Message-id: <[🔎] 8FED7618-DBE2-434E-9074-DA3F21E25981@lvivier.info>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 20061108212130.GK13975@country.grep.be>
References: <[🔎] 20061108195605.GG13975@country.grep.be> <[🔎] 2ABF3724-EFB7-4CF7-8037-C819A5C1804D@lvivier.info> <[🔎] 20061108212130.GK13975@country.grep.be>

Le 8 nov. 06 à 22:21, Wouter Verhelst a écrit :

On Wed, Nov 08, 2006 at 10:03:33PM +0100, Laurent Vivier wrote:

According to the error, you should try to remove the line ".chip 68000",
it's only to make emile working on mac classic.

Ah. Silly me. Of course...

Thanks. Though I still wonder why it was working in the past...

Personnaly I use binutils 2.15, so I think binutils 2.17 adds some (stupid) constraints between architecture and processor...

Regards,

Laurent

---------------------- Laurent Vivier ----------------------

"Imagination is more important than knowledge."

Attachment: PGP.sig
Description: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Ceci_est_une_signature_=E9lectronique_PGP?=

Reply to:

Follow-Ups:
- Re: building emile
  - From: Wouter Verhelst <wouter@grep.be>

References:
- building emile
  - From: Wouter Verhelst <wouter@debian.org>
- Re: building emile
  - From: Laurent Vivier <laurent@lvivier.info>
- Re: building emile
  - From: Wouter Verhelst <wouter@grep.be>

Prev by Date: Re: building emile
Next by Date: Re: building emile
Previous by thread: Re: building emile
Next by thread: Re: building emile
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread