Re: [buildd] binutils failure

To: Roman Zippel <zippel@linux-m68k.org>
Cc: Michael Schmitz <schmitz@mail.biophys.uni-duesseldorf.de>, debian-68k@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: [buildd] binutils failure
From: Michael Schmitz <schmitz@mail.biophys.uni-duesseldorf.de>
Date: Tue, 24 Oct 2006 18:02:31 +0200 (CEST)
Message-id: <[🔎] Pine.LNX.4.58.0610241801570.31678@xplor.biophys.uni-duesseldorf.de>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] Pine.LNX.4.64.0610241740180.7817@scrub.home>
References: <[🔎] 453CB683.5010205@midg3t.net> <[🔎] Pine.LNX.4.58.0610241234540.30455@xplor.biophys.uni-duesseldorf.de> <[🔎] Pine.LNX.4.64.0610241740180.7817@scrub.home>

> > binutils failed on q650 due to undeclared PAGE_SIZE. Ideas, anyone?
>
> Upgrade linux-kernel-headers.

ii  linux-kernel-h 2.6.18-1       Linux Kernel Headers for development

That's not recent enough?

	Michael

Reply to:

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [buildd] binutils failure
  - From: Stephen R Marenka <stephen@marenka.net>

References:
- [buildd] ccontrol ready for m68k
  - From: Ted Percival <ted@midg3t.net>
- [buildd] binutils failure
  - From: Michael Schmitz <schmitz@mail.biophys.uni-duesseldorf.de>
- Re: [buildd] binutils failure
  - From: Roman Zippel <zippel@linux-m68k.org>

Prev by Date: Re: python2.4 build failed for stable-security
Next by Date: Re: [buildd] binutils failure
Previous by thread: Re: [buildd] binutils failure
Next by thread: Re: [buildd] binutils failure
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread