Re: m68k not a release arch for etch; status in testing, future plans?

To: Thomas Bushnell BSG <tb@becket.net>
Cc: debian-release@lists.debian.org, debian-68k@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: m68k not a release arch for etch; status in testing, future plans?
From: Roman Zippel <zippel@linux-m68k.org>
Date: Sat, 21 Oct 2006 00:15:48 +0200 (CEST)
Message-id: <[🔎] Pine.LNX.4.64.0610210011420.6761@scrub.home>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] u1hzmbq1wd3.fsf@kempis.becket.net>
References: <20060918065502.GA7069@mauritius.dodds.net> <[🔎] 20061017034207.GA5506@azure.humbug.org.au> <[🔎] 20061017071252.GL8667@2004.bluespice.org> <[🔎] 20061017233000.GA12190@azure.humbug.org.au> <[🔎] 20061018081010.GJ3954@bee.dooz.org> <[🔎] 20061018084502.GE18966@2004.bluespice.org> <[🔎] 20061018094452.GD10085@ouaza.com> <[🔎] 20061018125532.GE4007@bee.dooz.org> <[🔎] 20061018174340.GB18495@azure.humbug.org.au> <[🔎] Pine.LNX.4.64.0610182140570.7817@scrub.home> <[🔎] u1hac3tqjlb.fsf@kempis.becket.net> <[🔎] Pine.LNX.4.64.0610190147370.7817@scrub.home> <[🔎] u1h64ehqfhl.fsf@kempis.becket.net> <[🔎] Pine.LNX.4.64.0610190320040.7817@scrub.home> <[🔎] u1hfydi3bnb.fsf@kempis.becket.net> <[🔎] Pine.LNX.4.64.0610202351141.6761@scrub.home> <[🔎] u1hzmbq1wd3.fsf@kempis.becket.net>

Hi,

On Fri, 20 Oct 2006, Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote:

> > Hmm and here I thought you would care about this package, the way you 
> > constantly asked about its status...
> 
> I do care about it.  But I see no particular reason for urgency about
> the particular bug, and obviously, the m68k team doesn't either.

Obviously?

bye, Roman

Reply to:

Follow-Ups:
- Re: m68k not a release arch for etch; status in testing, future plans?
  - From: Thomas Bushnell BSG <tb@becket.net>

References:
- Re: m68k not a release arch for etch; status in testing, future plans?
  - From: Anthony Towns <aj@azure.humbug.org.au>
- Re: m68k not a release arch for etch; status in testing, future plans?
  - From: Ingo Juergensmann <ij@2006.bluespice.org>
- Re: m68k not a release arch for etch; status in testing, future plans?
  - From: Anthony Towns <aj@azure.humbug.org.au>
- Re: m68k not a release arch for etch; status in testing, future plans?
  - From: Loïc Minier <lool+debian@via.ecp.fr>
- Re: m68k not a release arch for etch; status in testing, future plans?
  - From: Ingo Juergensmann <ij@2006.bluespice.org>
- Re: m68k not a release arch for etch; status in testing, future plans?
  - From: Raphael Hertzog <hertzog@debian.org>
- Re: m68k not a release arch for etch; status in testing, future plans?
  - From: Loïc Minier <lool+debian@via.ecp.fr>
- Re: m68k not a release arch for etch; status in testing, future plans?
  - From: Anthony Towns <aj@azure.humbug.org.au>
- Re: m68k not a release arch for etch; status in testing, future plans?
  - From: Roman Zippel <zippel@linux-m68k.org>
- Re: m68k not a release arch for etch; status in testing, future plans?
  - From: Thomas Bushnell BSG <tb@becket.net>
- Re: m68k not a release arch for etch; status in testing, future plans?
  - From: Roman Zippel <zippel@linux-m68k.org>
- Re: m68k not a release arch for etch; status in testing, future plans?
  - From: Thomas Bushnell BSG <tb@becket.net>
- Re: m68k not a release arch for etch; status in testing, future plans?
  - From: Roman Zippel <zippel@linux-m68k.org>
- Re: m68k not a release arch for etch; status in testing, future plans?
  - From: Thomas Bushnell BSG <tb@becket.net>
- Re: m68k not a release arch for etch; status in testing, future plans?
  - From: Roman Zippel <zippel@linux-m68k.org>
- Re: m68k not a release arch for etch; status in testing, future plans?
  - From: Thomas Bushnell BSG <tb@becket.net>

Prev by Date: Re: m68k not a release arch for etch; status in testing, future plans?
Next by Date: Re: m68k not a release arch for etch; status in testing, future plans?
Previous by thread: Re: m68k not a release arch for etch; status in testing, future plans?
Next by thread: Re: m68k not a release arch for etch; status in testing, future plans?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread