On Wed, Oct 18, 2006 at 06:11:38PM +0200, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: > Assumed m68k would be able to kill (most of) the backlog in time, what would > prevent m68k from becoming releasable? > - It didn't sustain the `95%' rate during the last x months? x=3, yes. The sustainability issue is important, because it's the best evidence we can get that the arch will be supportable for ongoing security updates. Cheers, aj
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature