Re: QEMU

To: Bill Allombert <allomber@math.u-bordeaux.fr>
Cc: Debian GNU/Linux m68k <debian-68k@lists.debian.org>
Subject: Re: QEMU
From: Roman Zippel <zippel@linux-m68k.org>
Date: Wed, 18 Oct 2006 23:52:14 +0200 (CEST)
Message-id: <[🔎] Pine.LNX.4.64.0610182350010.7817@scrub.home>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 20061018213549.GI27483@seventeen>
References: <[🔎] 20061011213736.GN19078@seventeen> <[🔎] Pine.LNX.4.58.0610121230100.1020@xplor.biophys.uni-duesseldorf.de> <[🔎] Pine.LNX.4.62.0610121834420.14335@pademelon.sonytel.be> <[🔎] 1161174515.844.4.camel@laptop-lcs.localdomain> <[🔎] Pine.LNX.4.62.0610181432290.29508@pademelon.sonytel.be> <[🔎] 1161176566.844.7.camel@laptop-lcs.localdomain> <[🔎] 20061018132310.GA27483@seventeen> <[🔎] Pine.LNX.4.62.0610182246300.22703@pademelon.sonytel.be> <[🔎] Pine.LNX.4.64.0610182256140.7817@scrub.home> <[🔎] 20061018213549.GI27483@seventeen>

Hi,

On Wed, 18 Oct 2006, Bill Allombert wrote:

> Is your m68k-linux-gnu-gcc a cross compiler ? Is it available somewhere ? 

Simply get a recent gcc debian source and follow the instructions in 
debian/README.cross.

bye, Roman

Reply to:

References:
- benchmark between aranym and crest
  - From: Bill Allombert <allomber@math.u-bordeaux.fr>
- Re: benchmark between aranym and crest
  - From: Michael Schmitz <schmitz@mail.biophys.uni-duesseldorf.de>
- Re: benchmark between aranym and crest
  - From: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>
- Re: QEMU (was: benchmark between aranym and crest)
  - From: Kars de Jong <jongk@linux-m68k.org>
- Re: QEMU (was: benchmark between aranym and crest)
  - From: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>
- Re: QEMU
  - From: Kars de Jong <jongk@linux-m68k.org>
- Re: QEMU
  - From: Bill Allombert <allomber@math.u-bordeaux.fr>
- Re: QEMU
  - From: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>
- Re: QEMU
  - From: Roman Zippel <zippel@linux-m68k.org>
- Re: QEMU
  - From: Bill Allombert <allomber@math.u-bordeaux.fr>

Prev by Date: Re: QEMU
Next by Date: Re: m68k not a release arch for etch; status in testing, future plans?
Previous by thread: Re: QEMU
Next by thread: Re: QEMU
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread