On Wednesday 18 October 2006 10:43, Ingo Juergensmann wrote: > > And I have not seen any serious work or proposals from m68k porters > > in this direction either. > > Not? > Especially Roman has put great effort into fixing bugs and making the > toolchain stable again during the last weeks. That is about getting back release status, which is a station that has been passed. I was talking about work on an alternative solution: how best to make the m68k port available to users *given that it is not a release arch for Etch*.
Attachment:
pgpa3v9z2p06G.pgp
Description: PGP signature