Re: m68k not a release arch for etch; status in testing, future plans?

[Aurélien GÉRÔME <ag@roxor.cx>]

On Tue, Oct 17, 2006 at 12:42:30AM -0700, Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote:
> Bill Allombert <allomber@math.u-bordeaux.fr> writes:
> 
> > On Tue, Oct 17, 2006 at 12:28:55AM -0700, Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote:
> >> 
> >> It's not like I hunted around for problems, I simply looked at the
> >> cases closest to the packages I maintain, asking "why don't they work
> >> on m68k?"
> >
> > I expected you would have realised by that time that you maintain some
> > of the most problematic packages in Debian (seriously).
> 
> Riiiight.  I don't maintain guile or g-wrap, you know.

Yes, true. However, you are supposed to maintain lilypond, but it
is a different story here... Anway, why are you bashing m68k folks
who help, instead of being helpful yourself? m68k porters are doing
a lot of work to keep the port alive which is admirable.

Cheers,
-- 
 .''`.   Aurélien GÉRÔME
: :'  :
`. `'`   Free Software Developer
  `-     Unix Sys & Net Admin

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature