Re: m68k not a release arch for etch; status in testing, future plans?
On Tue, Oct 17, 2006 at 01:02:28AM -0700, Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote:
> And that's why g-wrap hasn't been built, or is it irrelevant?
Yes, this is irrelevant for this thread as the topic of this thread is "m68k
not a release arch for etch; status in testing, future plans?" and not
"Thomas Bushnell would like to see his packages being built on m68k". Maybe
that's disappointing for you know, but I'm more interested in the big
picture of getting m68k released with Etch.
So, be welcomed to discuss the on-topic questions with us. :-)
--
Ciao... // Fon: 0381-2744150
Ingo \X/ SIP: 2744150@sipgate.de
gpg pubkey: http://www.juergensmann.de/ij/public_key.asc
Reply to:
- References:
- Re: m68k not a release arch for etch; status in testing, future plans?
- From: Roman Zippel <zippel@linux-m68k.org>
- Re: m68k not a release arch for etch; status in testing, future plans?
- From: Thomas Bushnell BSG <tb@becket.net>
- Re: m68k not a release arch for etch; status in testing, future plans?
- From: Roman Zippel <zippel@linux-m68k.org>
- Re: m68k not a release arch for etch; status in testing, future plans?
- From: Thomas Bushnell BSG <tb@becket.net>
- Re: m68k not a release arch for etch; status in testing, future plans?
- From: Bill Allombert <ballombe@master.debian.org>
- Re: m68k not a release arch for etch; status in testing, future plans?
- From: Thomas Bushnell BSG <tb@becket.net>
- Re: m68k not a release arch for etch; status in testing, future plans?
- From: Ingo Juergensmann <ij@2006.bluespice.org>
- Re: m68k not a release arch for etch; status in testing, future plans?
- From: Thomas Bushnell BSG <tb@becket.net>
- Re: m68k not a release arch for etch; status in testing, future plans?
- From: Ingo Juergensmann <ij@2006.bluespice.org>
- Re: m68k not a release arch for etch; status in testing, future plans?
- From: Thomas Bushnell BSG <tb@becket.net>