Re: m68k not a release arch for etch; status in testing, future plans?
* Stephen R Marenka (firstname.lastname@example.org) [060919 15:20]:
> I think we do need to have a discussion about ports that don't build the
> full archive, but otherwise can make a stable release and get security
> I'd still like a stable, security-supported, m68k port. It doesn't need
> all of kde or gnome or openoffice. I don't know that anyone will ever try
> to run gnucash or gnuradio on it. I know there is interest in running X,
> web and mail servers, and irc clients. Anything less will make it hard to
> support the port and two years to another release is a long time.
Perhaps we can do something like amd64.d.n for m68k as well for etch?