[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: [buildd] Etch?

On Thu, Aug 03, 2006 at 08:55:37PM +0200, Ingo Juergensmann wrote:
> I think we should start with sorting packages out that have a long term
> history of FTBFS. It seems unlikely to me that these packages can be fixed
> in time for the release. Adding to N-F-U or P-A-S would be best.
> The main goal should be to give a stable release to all those m68k users out
> there, not to keep as much packages buildable on m68k as possible. 

Our last successful build of subversion was 1.2.0-1 on June 14, 2005.
The current version is 1.3.2-5. Subversion is blocking 7 packages.

Our last successful build of emacs21 was 21.4a-1 on March 18, 2005.
The current version is 21.4a-6. emacs21 is blocking 14 packages.

If we can't build basic tools like subversion and emacs21, does the rest 
of that really matter?

Stephen R. Marenka     If life's not fun, you're not doing it right!

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Reply to: