Re: <math.h> on m68k and pari
On Thu, Jun 29, 2006 at 10:16:47AM -0500, Stephen R Marenka wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 29, 2006 at 04:00:45PM +0200, Bill Allombert wrote:
>
> > I would like to investigate the build failure of pari (2.3.0-1) on m68k.
> > (I have to say the packages was building fine with gcc 4.1.0-2 so
> > I am surprised that gcc 4.1.1-2 miscompile it.
The good news is that pari 2.3.0-2 was built fine on m68k.
> Are you sure? This bug has been in glibc for a while, certainly before I
> reported in November. Perhaps that gcc didn't end up invoking
> __USE_EXTERN_INLINES the same way.
>
> > Does the buildds carry the broken libc6-dev packages as well ?
>
> If they don't, then we have a badly outdated buildd.
Well I don't understand why I cannot compile pari on crest but the
autobuilder can.
Toolchain package versions:
crest: libc6-dev_2.3.6-15 linux-kernel-headers_2.6.17.1-1 gcc-4.1_4.1.1-5 binutils_2.16.1cvs20060413-1
buildd(tanda): libc6-dev_2.3.6-15 linux-kernel-headers_2.6.17.1-1 gcc-4.1_4.1.1-2 binutils_2.16.1cvs20060413-1
so maybe it is a gcc-4.1 issue.
Cheers,
--
Bill. <ballombe@debian.org>
Imagine a large red swirl here.
Reply to: