[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: [buildd] old building



On Sun, Jun 25, 2006 at 11:23:37AM +0200, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
> [x-post between -68k and m68k-build, with [buildd] tag in subject...]
> 
> Hi,
> 
> Unstable is back to 12 needs-build now, which makes it appear as though
> our backlog is almost cleared. Unfortunately, that's not true -- there's
> 86 packages in Building, and 92 in dep-wait.
> 
> So that we don't get buildd's running dry in a few days (very likely,
> since we were around 100 just a few days ago), could everyone please
> check their buildd hosts for packages in state 'building' that are not
> built yet and are not listed in ~buildd/build/build-progress either?
> Those have slipped through and should be requeued.

Speaking of which, koffice should build now but needs major diskspace.
Garkin (36 hours) and a4000t (44 hours) have built it most recently. I
don't know what other buildds can handle 945372k disk space. 

If yours can't, better to no-auto-build koffice.

I believe we've all decided that debian-68k will do for buildd stuff. If
I misunderstood, speak up now.

-- 
Stephen R. Marenka     If life's not fun, you're not doing it right!
<stephen@marenka.net>

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Reply to: