Re: Bug#340563: Optimizer bug, presumably.
On Sun, Jan 08, 2006 at 02:37:37PM -0500, Steve M. Robbins wrote:
> Wouter,
>
> Thanks very much for your help on this bug!
>
> On Sat, Dec 31, 2005 at 05:58:10PM +0100, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
>
> > My previous attempt wasn't of much help, I presume ;-)
>
> No. :-)
>
> But you did say there that the failure is there even compiling with
> -O0. Is that correct?
There is a failure even when compilin without -O. However, it seems to
be a different one.
--
.../ -/ ---/ .--./ / .--/ .-/ .../ -/ ../ -./ --./ / -.--/ ---/ ..-/ .-./ / -/
../ --/ ./ / .--/ ../ -/ ..../ / -../ ./ -.-./ ---/ -../ ../ -./ --./ / --/
-.--/ / .../ ../ --./ -./ .-/ -/ ..-/ .-./ ./ .-.-.-/ / --/ ---/ .-./ .../ ./ /
../ .../ / ---/ ..-/ -/ -../ .-/ -/ ./ -../ / -/ ./ -.-./ ..../ -./ ---/ .-../
---/ --./ -.--/ / .-/ -./ -.--/ .--/ .-/ -.--/ .-.-.-/ / ...-.-/
Reply to: