Re: missing evolution-data-server build on m68k (zot)

[Rick Younie <rick@def.debian.net>]

Steve Langasek wrote:
> 
> ...
> 
>> Would've helped had you sent this to m68k-build instead of the other
>> list :-)
> 
> Sorry, I vaguely recall discussion about having porters use this list
> instead of the m68k-buildd list -- did I misinterpret that discussion, or
> was the outcome different than I remembered?

One or two of us don't follow debian-68k for hysterical
raisins but enough of us follow both that it doesn't
much matter.  What you're seeing here is probably a case
of "the best defense...."

Rick
--