Re: libc6-dev conflict
On Sat, Jul 12, 2003 at 07:38:11PM +0000, Lance Tagliapietra wrote:
> [Note: Posted to the list, as the original reply went directly
> to Christian.]
>
> Hi Christian,
>
> Thanks for replying to my inquiry. My information is different than
> what you provided. When I installed Woody, I did tell the installer
> that I wanted the security updates when I installed Woody.
>
> My Apt sources list:
> #deb http://debian.uchicago.edu/debian/ stable main non-free contrib
> #deb-src http://debian.uchicago.edu/debian/ stable main non-free contrib
> #deb http://non-us.debian.org/debian-non-US stable/non-US main contrib non-free
> #deb-src http://non-us.debian.org/debian-non-US stable/non-US main contrib non-free
>
> #deb http://security.debian.org/ stable/updates main contrib non-free
>
> deb http://debian.uchicago.edu/debian/ stable main non-free contrib
> deb-src http://debian.uchicago.edu/debian/ stable main non-free contrib
> deb http://non-us.debian.org/debian-non-US stable/non-US main contrib non-free
> deb-src http://non-us.debian.org/debian-non-US stable/non-US main contrib non-free
>
> deb http://security.debian.org/ stable/updates main contrib non-free
>
> ***end***
>
> My tools don't tell me that a 2.3.* is available, just 2.2.*. Are you
> running stuff from testing? For example:
I assume, from unstable. See the thread on debian-powerpc and bugs
about 2.3.x being broken, maybe this is what you are running into.
--
Debian GNU/Linux Operating System
By the People, For the People
Chris Tillman (a people instance)
toff one at cox dot net
Reply to: