Re: Patching kernel-sources.
Hi Christian
On 12-Feb-03, you wrote:
>> Darn... typo.. 2.4.14 was what I ment.
>
> I hope its obvious that the procedure for that is very similar?
> But if I had as much time as you, I would try to get something recent,
> 2.4.20 or even 2.5 from CVS. And if the linux-m68k CVS does not work,
> linux-mac68k kernel sources where pretty good last time I tried. I
> don't think the 2.4.14 kernel-patch is very useful, there must be a
> reason why there are no 2.4.14 kernel-images. I had some luck with
> 2.4.18 from CVS, haven't tried 2.4.20 yet.
Ok, I'll have a look at any of those then. 2.4.14 wouldn't compile anyway.
Regards
--
Thomas Sjölin
http://home.infoscandic.se/thomas
I like work ... I can sit and watch it for hours.
Reply to: