Re: gcc-2.95 bugs on m68k: what to do ?
On Tue, Oct 29, 2002 at 06:10:57PM +0100, Yann Dirson wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 21, 2002 at 09:43:05PM +0200, Matthias Klose wrote:
> > Yann Dirson writes:
> > > I have several packages (e2fsprogs, bigloo) that fail to build on
> > > m68k, apparently due to one or more gcc bug(s). Maybe that's the same
> > > as #146006, and #89023, but I can't tell that myself.
> > >
> > > Madkiss suggested forcing the use of gcc-3.2. But if this compiler is
> > > officially broken on m68k, I'd rather not change those packages and
> > > have the autobuilders use gcc-3.2 at least for m68k...
> > >
> > > What about changing build-essential list to make gcc-3.2 the default
> > > on m68k ?
would be the best solution imho.
> > AFAIK, the needed libgcc1-compat library is not yet built for m68k
> > (CCing the glibc people)
> Anything new here ?
I hope you have fixed your mailer, last time I found no way to send you