Re: Unidentified subject!
Richard Zidlicky <Richard.Zidlicky@stud.informatik.uni-erlangen.de> writes:
|> On Fri, Jan 11, 2002 at 01:35:51PM +0100, Andreas Schwab wrote:
|>
|> > I'd prefer this, to allow more freedom to the compiler:
|> >
|> > asm volatile (".chip 68040; ptestw (%0); chip 68k" : : "a" (addr));
|>
|> is there a dot missing at the second 'chip' or is it some alternative
|> syntax?
No, the dot is missing. Sorry for the typo.
Andreas.
--
Andreas Schwab, SuSE Labs, schwab@suse.de
SuSE GmbH, Deutschherrnstr. 15-19, D-90429 Nürnberg
Key fingerprint = 58CA 54C7 6D53 942B 1756 01D3 44D5 214B 8276 4ED5
"And now for something completely different."
Reply to: