Re: libc6 2.2.1 malloc() bug
On Mon, Mar 05, 2001 at 12:11:38PM +0100, Michael Fedrowitz wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 02, 2001 at 13:31:57 -0000, Nick Holgate wrote:
> > 1st malloc succeeded - errno = 38
> > 2nd malloc succeeded - errno = 0
> Weird. I get errno = 0 for both with the glibc 2.2.1 and 2.2.2 I've built
> myself. Maybe this is another strange effect of building with 2.4 headers?
Hmm, that might explain some things. Since recently I get some logrotate
mails which say (none) as hostname, thats new and might have happened with
glibc2.2.1... so we go back to kernel-headers 2.2.10? Somebody explain BenC?