[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: libc6 2.2.1 malloc() bug



On Fri, Mar 02, 2001 at 13:31:57 -0000, Nick Holgate wrote:

> 1st malloc succeeded - errno = 38
> 2nd malloc succeeded - errno = 0

Weird. I get errno = 0 for both with the glibc 2.2.1 and 2.2.2 I've built
myself. Maybe this is another strange effect of building with 2.4 headers?

-Michael



Reply to: