On Wed, Aug 20, 2014 at 4:48 PM, Holger Levsen <holger@layer-acht.org> wrote:Seconded. This is what mailman held due to a missing subscription
> videos.d.n is quite very confusing as there is already video.d.n
(with the correct sending address):
Does it really make sense to have 'video' and 'videos' at once? It
seems as if this would lead to confusion down the road.
Will the service at videoS.d.n live for a long time? If not, another
namespace may be better.
In this specific case, video.debconf14.debconf.org might be the best
option. Event-specific and without risk of confusion. It _is_ kinda
long, though.
Richard
_______________________________________________
Debconf-video mailing list
Debconf-video@lists.debconf.org
http://lists.debconf.org/mailman/listinfo/debconf-video