Hi 皇甫,
先前有諮詢"托育小幫手"師生比的問題
我們找的工作內容是孩童陪伴(又名:陪玩)，不得涉及生理照護(例如洗澡、換尿布)
就諮詢結果，保母的收托上限不適用於孩童陪伴/伴讀
因網路上只有保母的制式合約，所以我用保母的制式合約，並拿掉生理照護部分
目前找到的兩名照護人員:一名有保母執照、一名未表示有保母執照(應該沒有)
孩童照護的年齡分布: 五名都是三到七歲，其中一名只會參加約兩天
若活動中有任何臨時委託，會確保比例在1:3以下
Hi HuangFu,
I consulted sitter/child ratio problem with Bananny (a match making company
for sitter) before.
The job content for sitters is just companying with children which is exclude
any kinds of physiological care.
According to the consultancy, the law for the maximum number of children
does not apply to this kind of job.
Because there is only standard contract for nanny on the web, I remove all
the physiological care parts based on the standard contract.
The two sitters we found, one declares she has licence,
another one does not mention licence(likely no)
Info abount children: 5 children (3 year-old ~ 7 year-old), one of the children
may only attend about 2 days.
If we have any temporary childcare request during conference, we will make sure
the sitter/child ratio is less than 1:3.