[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: [Debconf-team] Event "tracks" (was: talk submissions: wafertest vs. summit)



martin f krafft dijo [Fri, Feb 05, 2016 at 12:04:35PM +1100]:
> > I'd appreciate if we were able to add tracks to our current setup.
> > OTOH, we have sometimes defined tracks based on preexisting talks
> > rather than (or additionally to) the other way around... So we can
> > get to that point later on.
> 
> Wafer does not have the concept of tracks, currently. It can
> probably added pretty trivially, but before we take this upstream,
> I'd really appreciate if we could evaluate this first and conclude
> that we really benefit from tracks.
> 
> Do we? How do we want to use them?

We *have* used them in the past quite a bit, and they were very
successful.

But then again, at some other DebConfs, they have been quite
meaningless.

It depends on the content team in question, and even on the cultures
of the different speakers (and audiences).

Reply to: