[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: [Debconf-team] Budget (hopefully) ready for Thursday's discussion / approval



also sprach Steve Langasek <vorlon@debian.org> [2015-03-13 02:52 +0100]:
> If it's not encoded as an earmark from one of our "sponsors" (e.g. Debian),
> I don't see any reason for this to be encoded at the budget level.  That
> simply adds an additional constraint on how the bursaries team can use the
> funds for Debian's benefit.

It's a different kind of expense than whan bursaries are normally
using funds.

-- 
 .''`.   martin f. krafft <madduck@debconf.org> @martinkrafft
: :'  :  DebConf orga team
`. `'`
  `-  DebConf15: Heidelberg, Germany: http://debconf15.debconf.org
      DebConf16: Cape Town: https://wiki.debconf.org/wiki/DebConf16

Attachment: digital_signature_gpg.asc
Description: Digital signature (see http://martin-krafft.net/gpg/sig-policy/999bbcc4/current)


Reply to: