also sprach Lucas Nussbaum <leader@debian.org> [2015-03-12 09:49 +0100]:
> I think that we should clarify what 'budget approval' means, maybe. From
> my perspective, it means:
> - Chairs and DPL have looked at it, and are fine with the general shape
> of it
> - We agree on a plan about how to address the remaining questions
> - Changes can still be made, but major changes require discussion with
> Chairs and/or DPL
Plus:
- Funds can be used according to the budget lines, right away.
Changes made later need to take this into account, i.e. money that
has already been spent cannot be re-allocated.
Ok?
> OK, I think I can live with the above (provided the chairs agree
> as well). However, please don't consider it for granted that we
> will use all the travel sponsorship budget. How much is used
> should still be based on the evaluation and recommendation by the
> bursaries.
Absolutely. Once the budget is approved, other people are empowered
to make decisions within their own domains and within the limits of
the allocated funds.
--
.''`. martin f. krafft <madduck@debconf.org> @martinkrafft
: :' : DebConf orga team
`. `'`
`- DebConf15: Heidelberg, Germany: http://debconf15.debconf.org
DebConf16: Cape Town: https://wiki.debconf.org/wiki/DebConf16
Attachment:
digital_signature_gpg.asc
Description: Digital signature (see http://martin-krafft.net/gpg/sig-policy/999bbcc4/current)