also sprach Santiago Ruano Rincón <santiago@debian.org> [2015-02-24 23:41 +0100]:
> <santiago> what about not having a default about food? the diet field
> could be mandatory, with an empty option by default
> ...
> <santiago> a real *-tagged field
I think this is the best suggestion so far. Form data with defaults
are less useful than data from forms that force people to stop and
think, so this should be a net gain.
If this could be agreed upon, then maybe calling the carnivore
option
"I eat meat/fish when available"
next to the other choices, and a free-form text field for
"restrictions" will solve the issue?
--
.''`. martin f. krafft <madduck@debconf.org> @martinkrafft
: :' : DebConf orga team
`. `'`
`- DebConf15: Heidelberg, Germany: http://debconf15.debconf.org
DebConf16: Cape Town: https://wiki.debconf.org/wiki/DebConf16
Attachment:
digital_signature_gpg.asc
Description: Digital signature (see http://martin-krafft.net/gpg/sig-policy/999bbcc4/current)