also sprach Margarita Manterola <margamanterola@gmail.com> [2015-02-14 19:21 +0100]:
> This was briefly discussed on IRC. It's unclear if we want to send one
> mail/announcement or two. I think one is better, but I don't have a
> very strong opinion. We need to decide this, write the text/s and
> send it/them out.
Here's an argument for two separate mails:
a separate call-for-registrations can be made more exciting if we
already have a few "highlights" to advertise as a result of the CfP.
People *can* register early, but if we don't make that official, we
don't run the risk of possibly having to send a second mail later
on reminding people to register (which makes the event appear
unpopular, even though it might just be due to timing).
--
.''`. martin f. krafft <madduck@debconf.org> @martinkrafft
: :' : DebConf orga team
`. `'`
`- DebConf15: Heidelberg, Germany: http://debconf15.debconf.org
DebConf16: Cape Town or Montreal? https://wiki.debconf.org/wiki/DebConf16
Attachment:
digital_signature_gpg.asc
Description: Digital signature (see http://martin-krafft.net/gpg/sig-policy/999bbcc4/current)