also sprach Giacomo Catenazzi <cate@debian.org> [2014-09-09 14:16 +0200]:
> Usually report workflow is: copy texts from previous debconf and
> adapt. So having all text in one repository I think would help
> having a more complete report. With split repository I assume we
> will use only last report, thus forgetting the forgotten chapters.
With the mr-workflow I put on the wiki, you actually won't be able
to notice any difference!
Also, even with a single repo, I have never bothered looking
anywhere other than last year's report. Have there been instances of
something that went missing this way?
--
.''`. martin f. krafft <madduck@debconf.org> @martinkrafft
: :' : DebConf orga team
`. `'`
`- DebConf14: Portland, OR, USA: http://debconf14.debconf.org
DebConf15: Heidelberg, Germany: http://debconf15.debconf.org
Attachment:
digital_signature_gpg.asc
Description: Digital signature (see http://martin-krafft.net/gpg/sig-policy/999bbcc4/current)